On Tuesday, January 28, 2025, the Dean of the Investigating Judges at the Court of First Instance in Tunis heard Yamina Zghlami, former member of the House of People’s Representatives (Ennahda Movement parliamentary bloc), kept her on bail and presented her for identification tests.
The case concerns the online plenary session held by the previous House of Representatives in March 2022, which sparked widespread controversy. The Public Prosecution Office at the Court of First Instance in Tunis had ordered the opening of an investigation against the participants in that virtual session, where they face charges including:
-Forming and participating in an illegal group.
-Assault intended to change the state structure.
-Inciting chaos and assaulting property and persons.
The number of defendants in the case is 100 former deputies belonging to the previous (dissolved) parliament from various parliamentary blocs, which held a virtual plenary session in defiance of the exceptional measures taken by Saied since July 25, 2021, including the suspension of parliament’s work. 116 deputies (the parliament includes 217 deputies) voted in favor a draft law repealing the exceptional measures taken by the president (no votes against or abstentions). Several of them called in their interventions for a national dialogue and parliamentary and presidential elections as a way out of the political, economic and social crisis. As a result, parliament was permanently dissolved.
Political context
This virtual session is part of the political tensions that Tunisia witnessed following President Kais Saied’s decisions to freeze the work of parliament in July 2021 and seize all powers. The case has sparked human rights criticism, as it falls within a series of prosecutions targeting opposition leaders.
Comment by the Freedom for Tunisia Observatory
The Tunisian Freedom Observatory calls for ensuring respect for the rights of the defense and transparency of judicial procedures in this case, while stressing the need for the authorities to adhere to international standards for a fair trial, far from any political exploitation of the judiciary and not to engage in a policy of retaliation for political positions.