Skip links

All Articles

Court of Appeal Postpones Hearing of Abir Moussi’s Case Following Complaint from Association for the Protection of Sacred Sites
The Criminal Chamber of the Tunis Court of Appeal decided on Friday, May 23, to postpone the hearing of the case against Abir Moussi, President of the Free Destourian Party, until June 20, 2025, in response to a request submitted by Moussi during the hearing.
Trial of the “Conspiracy Against State Security 2” case Postponed, Once Again, and All Defense Requests Rejected
The Criminal Chamber specializing in terrorism cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance decided on Tuesday to postpone the trial of the case known as “Conspiracy Against State Security 2” until June 24, 2025, rejecting all formal requests submitted by the defendants’ lawyers.
Indictment Chamber Rejects Bail Request for Lawyer Ahmed Souab Despite the Absence of Serious Charges
The Indictment Chamber specializing in terrorism cases at the Tunis Court of Appeal rejected the bail request submitted by lawyer and former administrative judge Ahmed Souab. Souab was imprisoned pursuant to a warrant issued by the investigating judge of the Judicial Counter-Terrorism Pole.
Abir Moussi’s Case Postponed Following Complaint by the Independent High Election Commission: Trial in the Absence of Defense
The Criminal Chamber of the Tunis Court of First Instance decided to postpone the case against Abir Moussi, leader of the Free Destourian Party (PDL), until June 12, 2025. This was in response to the request of the court-appointed lawyer to defend her, following the withdrawal of the original defense team in previous sessions.
Messaadine Prison: Journalist Chadha Haj Mbarek on Open Hunger Strike to Protest Denial of Medical Treatment
The family of detained journalist Chadha Haj Mbarek reported, in a moving letter conveyed by her sister, that Chadha has been on an open hunger strike since Wednesday, May 14, 2025, to protest the “blatant violation of her right to health care” inside Messaadine Prison in Sousse, where she has been detained in inhumane conditions.
48 Years in Prison for Mustafa Khidr: New Case Enshrines the Logic of “Selective Justice” in Terrorism Cases
On Tuesday, May 13, 2025, the Criminal Chamber specializing in terrorism cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance sentenced former army officer Mustafa Khidr in absentia to 48 years in prison and one of his sons to two years in prison in person. The court acquitted the remaining family members (wife, second son, and daughter).
عربية
Français
Icon-x Facebook Instagram Tiktok Youtube

Call to Action

Website petition: Freedom for prisoners of conscience and activists in Tunisia!

Tunisia is no longer the Arab exception that inspired the world in 2011 with a heroic revolution that overthrew the rule of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who ruled for nearly 23 years after seizing power on November 7, 1987, in a coup against Habib Bourguiba.

In a similar and perhaps more dangerous move, on the night of July 25, 2021, Tunisian President Kais Saied carried out a “constitutional coup” in accordance with his personal interpretation of Article 80 of the 2014 Revolutionary Constitution, announcing that he had taken a set of exceptional measures due to the “imminent danger” that threatens Tunisia without providing any details or reasons.

In accordance with these measures, Saied dismissed the government and the prime minister Hichem Mechichi who was present at the National Security Council that night at the Carthage Palace, and claimed that he had contacted the Speaker of Parliament Rached Ghannouchi (leader of the Ennahdha party) to consult with him in accordance with what is stipulated by the constitution, a claim which Ghannouchi denied since the call was general and did not include anything about exceptional measures or any consultation on the matter. The president suspended Parliament and later dissolved it in March 2022.

Not only did Saied seek to bypass his powers and the articles of the Constitution, which he swore to protect before the Assembly of the Representatives of the People, but he went on to dismiss and change the composition of the Supreme Judicial Council after redefining the judiciary it as a “function” rather than an independent authority. He further replaced members of the Supreme Electoral Commission in preparation for the referendum he held in order to vote on a constitution that he wrote himself after dismissing the proposals of the drafting committee he had himself appointed. Then legislative elections were held over two rounds, in which the participation rate did not exceed 8% of the total number of voters, with the Election Commission later announcing that it had reached 11%, which is the lowest participation rate in Tunisia and globally.

On February 11, President Saied’s regime launched a campaign of protests that has not stopped since, against political leaders, media figures, journalists, judges and senior officials and civil servants, for charges of “conspiring against the security of the state and committing an offensive act against the President of the Republic,” in addition to other charges that were referred to the military prosecution, leading one to wonder about the implication of the Tunisian army in the actions taken by Saied.

The arbitrary arrests were marred by several procedural violations amid criticism from prominent international organizations and observatories in the field of human rights. The standards of litigation and detention period and conditions were not respected. Prosecution and harassment sometimes extended to the detainees’ families, and no evidence, and in many cases, no charges against them were presented.

Moreover trade unions and political parties continue to be subjected to constant harassment and restrictions. Saied continues to target all “intermediary bodies” accusing them of “collaboration” or “treason”. Civil society associations have also been subjected to prosecution, arbitrary arrests and deprivation from representation, in a context of of increasing violence in society due to the authorities’ adoption of racist and discriminatory speeches and rhetoric inciting infighting and violating human dignity.

In light of the above, we, the undersigned, demand the following:

Call for the immediate release of all political detainees, immediately and unconditionally. We also urge the Tunisian authorities to recognize the national and the international human rights treaties they have ratified.
Call on the Tunisian authorities to stop dismantling the nascent democracy and put an end to unfair trials and prosecutions against political opponents of the regime and anyone who criticises it.
Call on all activists and observers to join the national movement for restoring democracy and ending authoritarian rule that has taken Tunisia back to despotism, injustice, and violations of rights and freedoms.