Tunis, June 9, 2025 – The Sixth Criminal Chamber of the Tunis Court of First Instance decided on Wednesday to postpone the hearing of the case against lawyer and journalist Sonia Dahmani until June 16. This is part of the investigation under Decree No. 54 on Combating Crimes Related to Information and Communication Systems.
The investigating judge at the Court of First Instance had previously decided to refer Sonia Dahmani to the court on bail. This was due to statements she made on a media program, which were deemed to constitute “false rumors” and “insulting others,” according to Article 24 of the same decree.
A series of prosecutions in a climate hostile to freedoms:
Sonia Dahmani was arrested in March 2024, amid an escalating crackdown on dissident voices for expressing critical views of the government’s policies. Since then, she has been subjected to several legal proceedings, most of which relate to politically motivated charges, most notably the use of information systems to spread “fake news” and “attributing false information to public officials.”
This trial comes within the context of ongoing harassment of Sonia Dahmani. In prison, she has been subjected to ill-treatment, denied her right to healthcare, and, at times, prevented from meeting her lawyer or contacting her family. This constitutes a clear violation of Tunisian law and international standards regarding the treatment of detainees.
The Freedom for Tunisia Observatory believes that Sonia Dahmani’s trial is part of a systematic process of criminalizing free expression in Tunisia, and that Decree No. 54 is being used as a legal tool to silence critics through vague charges that are not based on precise standards for protecting rights. The Observatory considers Dahmani’s continued detention and the deterioration of her conditions in prison to be a double violation of her right to freedom and physical integrity. It holds the judiciary responsible for any health or psychological harm she may suffer.
The Observatory calls for Dahmani’s immediate release, an end to the use of the judiciary to intimidate journalists and lawyers, and the repeal or revision of Decree No. 54 to ensure fundamental protection for freedom of expression and public debate in the country.