Skip links

14 Years in Prison, Fines Exceeding 37 Million Dinars, and Confiscation of 20 Properties in the Karoui Brothers’ Case

February 28, 2026 – The Criminal Chamber specializing in financial corruption cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance issued a verdict in absentia on Thursday evening, February 26, 2026, sentencing Nabil Karoui and his brother Ghazi Karoui to 14 years in prison with immediate effect. The charges stemmed from crimes related to money laundering by an organized group, the preparation of falsified accounting documents for tax evasion, and the transfer of assets to avoid tax debts.
 
The court also imposed fines exceeding 37 million dinars, ordered the confiscation of their frozen bank accounts for the benefit of the state and their deposit into a special account at the Central Bank in the name of the Public Treasury, and ordered the confiscation of all their shares in affiliated companies, as well as 20 properties owned by them.

Background of the Case:

On February 5, 2026, the Criminal Chamber decided to postpone the hearing of the case until February 26, after the Karoui brothers were referred to the court in absentia by the specialized financial corruption chamber of the Tunis Court of Appeal, which issued arrest warrants against them.
 
The charges stem from financial cases that were brought before the Financial Judicial Pole years ago, involving suspicions of tax evasion, money laundering, and other financial and administrative crimes. These cases were previously accompanied by precautionary measures such as travel bans and asset freezes.

General Context of the Case:

The Freedom for Tunisia Observatory notes that the Karoui brothers were among the most prominent political figures in the period leading up to July 25, 2021, the date on which Kais Saied announced the state of emergency measures.
 
Ghazi Karoui was a member of the dissolved parliament, while Nabil Karoui headed the Heart of Tunisia party, a key player in the parliamentary and political landscape, and a direct rival of President Kais Saied in the second round of the 2019 presidential elections.
 
The Observatory believes that this political context cannot be separated from the general climate of recent years, which has witnessed prosecutions and harsh sentences against prominent figures from the political class that shaped the landscape before July 25th.
 
The Observatory warns against entrenching a vindictive tendency or creating an atmosphere where judicial accountability is perceived as primarily targeting figures associated with the previous political era or those who have engaged in political disputes with the current authorities, which could undermine confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary.

Observations of the Freedom for Tunisia Observatory:

The Observatory notes that issuing a verdict in absentia raises serious issues concerning guaranteeing the right to a defense and the actual confrontation of evidence, especially in complex financial cases that rely heavily on technical expertise and accounting reports.
 
The imposition of heavy prison sentences, coupled with the widespread confiscation of assets and real estate, raises questions about the proportionality between the proven offenses and the imposed penalties, and the extent to which full procedural guarantees were respected in a trial held in absentia.
 
The Observatory affirms that combating corruption remains essential to protecting public funds, but this cannot be achieved in an environment characterized by targeting political opponents or reshaping the political landscape through the criminal justice system.

The Freedom for Tunisia Observatory’s Position:

The Freedom for Tunisia Observatory expresses its concern regarding the increasing number of harsh sentences issued against prominent political figures from the pre-July 25th era, within a tense political climate.
 
The Observatory emphasizes that the judiciary must not become a tool for restructuring the political landscape or settling scores with former actors, but rather must remain a neutral legal framework based on the precise individual evidence of criminal acts.
 
The Observatory also emphasizes the need for a strict separation between legitimate judicial accountability for proven financial crimes and any political exploitation that may target figures known for their opposition to or rivalry with the current authority.
 
The Freedom for Tunisia Observatory demands:
  • Guaranteeing the Karoui brothers’ right to appeal the verdict before higher courts.
  • Reviewing the verdict to ensure respect for the principle of proportionality between the proven acts and the imposed penalties.
  • Ensuring all conditions for a fair trial are met in financial cases with a political dimension.
  • Ceasing the persecution of political opponents and the targeting of figures from the period prior to July 25th, 2021.

Share

More Posts

Call to Action

Website petition: Freedom for prisoners of conscience and activists in Tunisia!

Tunisia is no longer the Arab exception that inspired the world in 2011 with a heroic revolution that overthrew the rule of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who ruled for nearly 23 years after seizing power on November 7, 1987, in a coup against Habib Bourguiba.

In a similar and perhaps more dangerous move, on the night of July 25, 2021, Tunisian President Kais Saied carried out a “constitutional coup” in accordance with his personal interpretation of Article 80 of the 2014 Revolutionary Constitution, announcing that he had taken a set of exceptional measures due to the “imminent danger” that threatens Tunisia without providing any details or reasons.

In accordance with these measures, Saied dismissed the government and the prime minister Hichem Mechichi who was present at the National Security Council that night at the Carthage Palace, and claimed that he had contacted the Speaker of Parliament Rached Ghannouchi (leader of the Ennahdha party) to consult with him in accordance with what is stipulated by the constitution, a claim which Ghannouchi denied since the call was general and did not include anything about exceptional measures or any consultation on the matter. The president suspended Parliament and later dissolved it in March 2022.

Not only did Saied seek to bypass his powers and the articles of the Constitution, which he swore to protect before the Assembly of the Representatives of the People, but he went on to dismiss and change the composition of the Supreme Judicial Council after redefining the judiciary it as a “function” rather than an independent authority. He further replaced members of the Supreme Electoral Commission in preparation for the referendum he held in order to vote on a constitution that he wrote himself after dismissing the proposals of the drafting committee he had himself appointed. Then legislative elections were held over two rounds, in which the participation rate did not exceed 8% of the total number of voters, with the Election Commission later announcing that it had reached 11%, which is the lowest participation rate in Tunisia and globally.

On February 11, President Saied’s regime launched a campaign of protests that has not stopped since, against political leaders, media figures, journalists, judges and senior officials and civil servants, for charges of “conspiring against the security of the state and committing an offensive act against the President of the Republic,” in addition to other charges that were referred to the military prosecution, leading one to wonder about the implication of the Tunisian army in the actions taken by Saied.

The arbitrary arrests were marred by several procedural violations amid criticism from prominent international organizations and observatories in the field of human rights. The standards of litigation and detention period and conditions were not respected. Prosecution and harassment sometimes extended to the detainees’ families, and no evidence, and in many cases, no charges against them were presented.

Moreover trade unions and political parties continue to be subjected to constant harassment and restrictions. Saied continues to target all “intermediary bodies” accusing them of “collaboration” or “treason”. Civil society associations have also been subjected to prosecution, arbitrary arrests and deprivation from representation, in a context of of increasing violence in society due to the authorities’ adoption of racist and discriminatory speeches and rhetoric inciting infighting and violating human dignity.

In light of the above, we, the undersigned, demand the following:

Call for the immediate release of all political detainees, immediately and unconditionally. We also urge the Tunisian authorities to recognize the national and the international human rights treaties they have ratified.
Call on the Tunisian authorities to stop dismantling the nascent democracy and put an end to unfair trials and prosecutions against political opponents of the regime and anyone who criticises it.
Call on all activists and observers to join the national movement for restoring democracy and ending authoritarian rule that has taken Tunisia back to despotism, injustice, and violations of rights and freedoms.